Memory corruption via invalid PNG width comparison
Published Sep 25, 2023 · Updated Nov 4, 2025
Heap buffer underwrite in Accusoft ImageGear 20.1 allows attackers to corrupt memory by loading a specially crafted malformed PNG file. The create_png_object reader uses an invalid unsigned comparison in a loop bounded by the IHDR width; a width of 3 with missing tags makes the loop write before its three-byte heap buffer. Exploitation requires a host application to process an attacker-supplied PNG, and the demonstrated consequence is an access-violation crash with heap corruption.
Summary
What happened
Heap buffer underwrite in Accusoft ImageGear 20.1 allows attackers to corrupt memory by loading a specially crafted malformed PNG file. The create_png_object reader uses an invalid unsigned comparison in a loop bounded by the IHDR width; a width of 3 with missing tags makes the loop write before its three-byte heap buffer. Exploitation requires a host application to process an attacker-supplied PNG, and the demonstrated consequence is an access-violation crash with heap corruption.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-32614
- Published
- Sep 25, 2023
- Updated
- Nov 4, 2025
- Vendor
- Accusoft
- Product
- ImageGear
- Classifications
- CWE-124, CWE-787
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Sep 25, 2023CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 4, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=20.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
- Cisco Talos malformed PNG crash demonstrationproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo