Authenticated job-processing interruption via FIFO archive imports
Published Nov 6, 2023 · Updated Nov 20, 2025
Resource exhaustion in affected GitLab versions allows remote authenticated users to interrupt Sidekiq through crafted project imports. The project-import worker extracts an attacker-supplied tar archive and opens a FIFO as a regular file, blocking until another process writes to it. A user with Maintainer-level import rights can submit enough FIFO-bearing archives to occupy all 20 default Sidekiq workers and halt queued background jobs.
Summary
What happened
Resource exhaustion in affected GitLab versions allows remote authenticated users to interrupt Sidekiq through crafted project imports. The project-import worker extracts an attacker-supplied tar archive and opens a FIFO as a regular file, blocking until another process writes to it. A user with Maintainer-level import rights can submit enough FIFO-bearing archives to occupy all 20 default Sidekiq workers and halt queued background jobs.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-3246
- Published
- Nov 6, 2023
- Updated
- Nov 20, 2025
- Vendor
- GitLab
- Product
- GitLab
- Classifications
- CWE-770, T1499
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Nov 6, 2023CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 20, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=10.3 <16.3.6
- Affected versionversion=16.4.0 <16.4.2
- Affected versionversion=16.5.0 <16.5.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- FIFO archive project-import proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo