Incorrect call success result via erroneous MLOAD
Published Apr 24, 2023 · Updated Feb 12, 2025
Incorrect control flow in Vyper 0.3.1 through 0.3.7 allows remote attackers to influence contracts through raw_call results. The raw_call builder emits CALL followed by MLOAD when revert_on_failure is false and max_outsize is zero, reading memory instead of the stack-held success flag. An affected contract must use that option combination, after which control flow can follow an incorrect True or False result determined by memory contents.
Summary
What happened
Incorrect control flow in Vyper 0.3.1 through 0.3.7 allows remote attackers to influence contracts through raw_call results. The raw_call builder emits CALL followed by MLOAD when revert_on_failure is false and max_outsize is zero, reading memory instead of the stack-held success flag. An affected contract must use that option combination, after which control flow can follow an incorrect True or False result determined by memory contents.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-30629
- Published
- Apr 24, 2023
- Updated
- Feb 12, 2025
- Vendor
- Vyper
- Product
- Vyper
- Classifications
- CWE-670
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 24, 2023CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Feb 12, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=>= 0.3.1, <= 0.3.7
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo