Remote code execution via off-by-one header overwrite
Published Nov 14, 2023 · Updated Nov 4, 2025
Memory corruption in uC-HTTP 3.01.01 allows remote attackers to execute code by sending a crafted HTTP header to an embedded server. HTTPsReq_HdrParse accepts a non-special header value whose length equals DataLenMax, then writes its NUL terminator one byte beyond the allocated buffer. The request must reach a server configured to retain that header; the overwrite can corrupt the heap freelist and enable an attacker-controlled allocation.
Summary
What happened
Memory corruption in uC-HTTP 3.01.01 allows remote attackers to execute code by sending a crafted HTTP header to an embedded server. HTTPsReq_HdrParse accepts a non-special header value whose length equals DataLenMax, then writes its NUL terminator one byte beyond the allocated buffer. The request must reach a server configured to retain that header; the overwrite can corrupt the heap freelist and enable an attacker-controlled allocation.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-28391
- Published
- Nov 14, 2023
- Updated
- Nov 4, 2025
- Vendor
- Sigma Designs
- Product
- Gecko Platform
- Classifications
- CWE-787, CWE-119, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Nov 14, 2023CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 4, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=4.3.1.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Cisco Talos crash reproduction and heap-corruption analysisproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo