Response splitting via unsanitized header values
Published Sep 12, 2023 · Updated Sep 26, 2024
HTTP response splitting in Crow before 1.3.2 allows remote attackers to inject response headers and bodies through crafted header values. The set_header and add_header methods insert caller-supplied names and values without removing CR or LF delimiters. Reachability requires an application route to pass attacker-controlled data into these APIs; successful injection can alter headers or a response body.
Summary
What happened
HTTP response splitting in Crow before 1.3.2 allows remote attackers to inject response headers and bodies through crafted header values. The set_header and add_header methods insert caller-supplied names and values without removing CR or LF delimiters. Reachability requires an application route to pass attacker-controlled data into these APIs; successful injection can alter headers or a response body.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-26142
- Published
- Sep 12, 2023
- Updated
- Sep 26, 2024
- Vendor
- CrowCpp
- Product
- Crow
- Classifications
- CWE-74, CWE-113, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Sep 12, 2023CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Sep 26, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <*
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- HTTP Response Splitting in Crow 1.0+5 proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo