Administrator-level browser script execution via stored XSS
Published May 4, 2023 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
Stored XSS in Biplob Adhikari Accordion – Multiple Accordion or FAQs Builder 2.3.0 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to inject script. Neither the CNA record nor its sole Patchstack advisory identifies the affected field or the missing sanitization or output-encoding operation. Administrator access is required to store the payload, and another user must view the affected content for the browser to execute it.
Summary
What happened
Stored XSS in Biplob Adhikari Accordion – Multiple Accordion or FAQs Builder 2.3.0 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to inject script. Neither the CNA record nor its sole Patchstack advisory identifies the affected field or the missing sanitization or output-encoding operation. Administrator access is required to store the payload, and another user must view the affected content for the browser to execute it.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-25962
- Published
- May 4, 2023
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- Biplob Adhikari
- Product
- Accordion – Multiple Accordion or FAQs Builder
- Classifications
- CWE-79, CAPEC-592, T1203
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- admin
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 4, 2023CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a <=2.3.0 changes=[{"at":"2.3.1","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo