Service interruption via TLS connection thread exhaustion
Published Oct 12, 2023 · Updated Aug 2, 2024
Resource exhaustion in SoftEther VPN 5.01.9674 and 5.02 allows remote attackers to crash the VPN server with repeated TLS connections. ConnectionAccept() creates a thread per accepted TCP connection, and TLS handshakes accumulate threads waiting on the shared Cedar lock until allocation calls Abort(). No authentication or user interaction is required; sustained connections can repeatedly restart the service and terminate existing VPN sessions.
Summary
What happened
Resource exhaustion in SoftEther VPN 5.01.9674 and 5.02 allows remote attackers to crash the VPN server with repeated TLS connections. ConnectionAccept() creates a thread per accepted TCP connection, and TLS handshakes accumulate threads waiting on the shared Cedar lock until allocation calls Abort(). No authentication or user interaction is required; sustained connections can repeatedly restart the service and terminate existing VPN sessions.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-25774
- Published
- Oct 12, 2023
- Updated
- Aug 2, 2024
- Vendor
- SoftEther VPN Project
- Product
- SoftEther VPN
- Classifications
- CWE-400, T1499
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Oct 12, 2023CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 2, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=5.01.9674
- Affected versionversion=5.02
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
- Repeated TLS connection exhaustion procedureproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo