Container privilege bypass via omitted supplementary group
Published Feb 16, 2023 · Updated Mar 10, 2025
Privilege management flaw in containerd before 1.5.18 and 1.6.0 through 1.6.17 allows local users to bypass group restrictions. OCI user-spec helpers and CRI container creation omit the primary GID from the supplementary group list when applying a configured container user. Code execution inside a Linux container, negative group permissions, and a usable setgid program are required, enabling access or execution that the primary group should deny.
Summary
What happened
Privilege management flaw in containerd before 1.5.18 and 1.6.0 through 1.6.17 allows local users to bypass group restrictions. OCI user-spec helpers and CRI container creation omit the primary GID from the supplementary group list when applying a configured container user. Code execution inside a Linux container, negative group permissions, and a usable setgid program are required, enabling access or execution that the primary group should deny.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-25173
- Published
- Feb 16, 2023
- Updated
- Mar 10, 2025
- Vendor
- containerd
- Product
- containerd
- Classifications
- CWE-269, CWE-863, T1068
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Feb 16, 2023CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Mar 10, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 1.5.18
- Affected versionversion=>= 1.6.0, < 1.6.18
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- permission-experiment Linux container demonstrationproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo