Authenticated code execution via malformed XPS file
Published Mar 14, 2023 · Updated Feb 28, 2025
Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft PostScript and PCL6 printer drivers allows remote authenticated users to execute code via a modified XPS file. The drivers process attacker-supplied XPS content into a heap buffer without adequate bounds enforcement; Microsoft has not disclosed the affected routine or field. Access to a shared printer with normal user privileges is required, and successful exploitation executes code on the printer host.
Summary
What happened
Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft PostScript and PCL6 printer drivers allows remote authenticated users to execute code via a modified XPS file. The drivers process attacker-supplied XPS content into a heap buffer without adequate bounds enforcement; Microsoft has not disclosed the affected routine or field. Access to a shared printer with normal user privileges is required, and successful exploitation executes code on the printer host.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-24907
- Published
- Mar 14, 2023
- Updated
- Feb 28, 2025
- Vendor
- Microsoft
- Product
- Windows 10 Version 1507
- Classifications
- CWE-122, T1210
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 14, 2023CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Feb 28, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=10.0.10240.0 <10.0.10240.19805
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo