Private commit disclosure via unchecked compare fallback
Published Jul 13, 2023 · Updated Oct 30, 2024
Authorization bypass in affected GitLab CE/EE releases allows remote authenticated users to read new commits in private projects. Compare#target_project accepts the fork's default_merge_request_target when from_project_id is omitted, bypassing the read_code check before CompareService fetches upstream commits. Reachability requires a fork made while the upstream project was public; disclosure is limited to subsequent repository content.
Summary
What happened
Authorization bypass in affected GitLab CE/EE releases allows remote authenticated users to read new commits in private projects. Compare#target_project accepts the fork's default_merge_request_target when from_project_id is omitted, bypassing the read_code check before CompareService fetches upstream commits. Reachability requires a fork made while the upstream project was public; disclosure is limited to subsequent repository content.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-2190
- Published
- Jul 13, 2023
- Updated
- Oct 30, 2024
- Vendor
- GitLab
- Product
- GitLab
- Classifications
- CWE-639, T1213.003
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 13, 2023CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Oct 30, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=13.10 <15.11.10
- Affected versionversion=16.0 <16.0.6
- Affected versionversion=16.1 <16.1.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- GitLab compare-page reproduction stepsproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo