Unauthorized downtime scheduling via missing access checks
Published Apr 18, 2023 · Updated Feb 5, 2025
Incorrect authorization in Checkmk 2.1.0 through 2.1.0p27 and 2.2.0 through 2.2.0b4 allows remote authenticated users to schedule downtimes. The REST API service-downtime handler failed to enforce both the wato.downtimes permission and access to the targeted host and service. Any account able to reach the authenticated API could suppress monitoring for services outside its authorized scope, without changing the underlying service.
Summary
What happened
Incorrect authorization in Checkmk 2.1.0 through 2.1.0p27 and 2.2.0 through 2.2.0b4 allows remote authenticated users to schedule downtimes. The REST API service-downtime handler failed to enforce both the wato.downtimes permission and access to the targeted host and service. Any account able to reach the authenticated API could suppress monitoring for services outside its authorized scope, without changing the underlying service.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-2020
- Published
- Apr 18, 2023
- Updated
- Feb 5, 2025
- Vendor
- Checkmk GmbH
- Product
- Checkmk
- Classifications
- CWE-863, CWE-280, T1562.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 18, 2023CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Feb 5, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=2.1.0 <=2.1.0p27
- Affected versionversion=2.2.0 <=2.2.0b4
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo