Root command execution via management request injection
Published Jan 19, 2023 · Updated Aug 2, 2024
Command injection in Cisco Small Business RV160 and RV260 router firmware before 1.0.01.04 allows remote authenticated users to run commands. Cisco attributes the flaw to insufficient input validation in the web-based management interface but does not disclose the request parameter or command-construction path. Administrator-level credentials are required, and successful exploitation executes arbitrary commands with root privileges over LAN or enabled WAN management.
Summary
What happened
Command injection in Cisco Small Business RV160 and RV260 router firmware before 1.0.01.04 allows remote authenticated users to run commands. Cisco attributes the flaw to insufficient input validation in the web-based management interface but does not disclose the request parameter or command-construction path. Administrator-level credentials are required, and successful exploitation executes arbitrary commands with root privileges over LAN or enabled WAN management.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-20045
- Published
- Jan 19, 2023
- Updated
- Aug 2, 2024
- Vendor
- ClamAV
- Product
- Cisco Small Business RV Series Router Firmware
- Classifications
- CWE-77, T1059
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- admin
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 19, 2023CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 2, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=N/A
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo