Unauthenticated service interruption via TLS close loop
Published Sep 14, 2023 · Updated Aug 2, 2024
Infinite loop in Undertow before 2.2.24 and 2.3.0 through 2.3.4 allows remote attackers to interrupt HTTPS service during closure. SslConduit.wrapAndFlip keeps calling SSLEngine.wrap while the handshake reports NEED_WRAP, even after the engine marks inbound processing complete. No authentication or user interaction is required; sustained looping consumes processing capacity and affects availability without reported data disclosure or modification.
Summary
What happened
Infinite loop in Undertow before 2.2.24 and 2.3.0 through 2.3.4 allows remote attackers to interrupt HTTPS service during closure. SslConduit.wrapAndFlip keeps calling SSLEngine.wrap while the handshake reports NEED_WRAP, even after the engine marks inbound processing complete. No authentication or user interaction is required; sustained looping consumes processing capacity and affects availability without reported data disclosure or modification.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-1108
- Published
- Sep 14, 2023
- Updated
- Aug 2, 2024
- Vendor
- Red Hat
- Product
- Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7
- Classifications
- CWE-835, T1499
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Sep 14, 2023CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 2, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Affected versions are unavailable in this record. Check the vendor advisory for version and patch details.
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo