Unauthenticated reflected XSS via unsanitized action parameter
Published Dec 30, 2025 · Updated Dec 30, 2025
Reflected XSS in ETAP Safety Manager 1.0.0.32 allows remote attackers to execute script in a victim's browser through an action request. The ESMweb application returns the action GET parameter without proper sanitization, placing attacker-controlled HTML and JavaScript into the affected site's response. No authentication is required, but a victim must follow a crafted request; successful exploitation runs script in that user's site context and can read or alter browser-accessible data.
Summary
What happened
Reflected XSS in ETAP Safety Manager 1.0.0.32 allows remote attackers to execute script in a victim's browser through an action request. The ESMweb application returns the action GET parameter without proper sanitization, placing attacker-controlled HTML and JavaScript into the affected site's response. No authentication is required, but a victim must follow a crafted request; successful exploitation runs script in that user's site context and can read or alter browser-accessible data.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-50802
- Published
- Dec 30, 2025
- Updated
- Dec 30, 2025
- Vendor
- ETAP Lighting International NV
- Product
- ETAP Safety Manager
- Classifications
- CWE-79, T1203
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 30, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Dec 30, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=1.0.0.32
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- ETAP Safety Manager action-parameter reflected XSS PoCproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo