Local kernel compromise via stale ACPICA walk state
Published Sep 18, 2025 · Updated Sep 18, 2025
Use-after-free in Linux kernel ACPICA allows local users to compromise the kernel by triggering a failed AML control-method call. On the error path, acpi_ds_call_control_method() frees next_walk_state without first removing it from the thread, so acpi_ps_parse_aml() retrieves and reuses the stale walk state. Low-privileged local access is required; successful exploitation can compromise kernel confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Summary
What happened
Use-after-free in Linux kernel ACPICA allows local users to compromise the kernel by triggering a failed AML control-method call. On the error path, acpi_ds_call_control_method() frees next_walk_state without first removing it from the thread, so acpi_ps_parse_aml() retrieves and reuses the stale walk state. Low-privileged local access is required; successful exploitation can compromise kernel confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-50411
- Published
- Sep 18, 2025
- Updated
- Sep 18, 2025
- Vendor
- The Linux Kernel Organization
- Product
- Linux
- Classifications
- CWE-416, T1068
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Sep 18, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Sep 18, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <0462fec709d51762ba486245bc344f44cc6cfa97
- Affected versionversion=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <2deb42c4f9776e59bee247c14af9c5e8c05ca9a6
- Affected versionversion=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <38e251d356a01b61a86cb35213cafd7e8fe7090c
- Affected versionversion=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <404ec60438add1afadaffaed34bb5fe4ddcadd40
- Affected versionversion=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <5777432ebaaf797e24f059979b42df3139967163
- Affected versionversion=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <799881db3e03b5e98fe6a900d9d7de8c7d61e7ee
- Affected versionversion=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <9ef353c92f9d04c88de3af1a46859c1fb76db0f8
- Affected versionversion=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <b0b83d3f3ffa96e8395c56b83d6197e184902a34
- Affected versionversion=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <f520d181477ec29a496c0b3bbfbdb7e2606c2713
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo