DisplayPort binding failure via mis-scoped bridge lifetime
Published Sep 15, 2025 · Updated Sep 15, 2025
Resource leakage in the Linux 5.19 DRM/MSM DisplayPort driver allows local users to interrupt aggregate DRM device binding. Bridges allocated after component binding are device-managed against the DP platform device instead of the aggregate DRM device, so probe deferral leaves them allocated and a retry can fail. Reachability requires the affected DRM/MSM DisplayPort path and deferred aggregate-device binding; the record does not establish user control over deferral.
Summary
What happened
Resource leakage in the Linux 5.19 DRM/MSM DisplayPort driver allows local users to interrupt aggregate DRM device binding. Bridges allocated after component binding are device-managed against the DP platform device instead of the aggregate DRM device, so probe deferral leaves them allocated and a retry can fail. Reachability requires the affected DRM/MSM DisplayPort path and deferred aggregate-device binding; the record does not establish user control over deferral.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-50292
- Published
- Sep 15, 2025
- Updated
- Sep 15, 2025
- Vendor
- The Linux Kernel Organization
- Product
- Linux
- Classifications
- Unavailable
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Sep 15, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Sep 15, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=5.19
- Affected versionversion=c3bf8e21b38a89418f2e22173b229aaad2306815 <16194958f888d63839042d1190f7001e5ddec47b
- Affected versionversion=c3bf8e21b38a89418f2e22173b229aaad2306815 <7eda6977e8058dd45607a5bbc6517a0f42ccd6c9
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
No sourced classifications are available.
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo