Service interruption via cyclic ext4 directory h-tree
Published Feb 26, 2025 · Updated Aug 5, 2026
Memory-safety flaw in affected Linux ext4 kernels allows local users to interrupt service through a maliciously corrupted filesystem. During a directory h-tree node split, ext4 follows cyclic block references, reuses nodes already validated, and then accesses unallocated memory. Exploitation requires the crafted ext4 filesystem to be mounted and a directory operation to trigger a node split; the documented consequence is limited to kernel service interruption.
Summary
What happened
Memory-safety flaw in affected Linux ext4 kernels allows local users to interrupt service through a maliciously corrupted filesystem. During a directory h-tree node split, ext4 follows cyclic block references, reuses nodes already validated, and then accesses unallocated memory. Exploitation requires the crafted ext4 filesystem to be mounted and a directory operation to trigger a node split; the documented consequence is limited to kernel service interruption.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-49343
- Published
- Feb 26, 2025
- Updated
- Aug 5, 2026
- Vendor
- The Linux Kernel Organization
- Product
- Linux
- Classifications
- T1499.004
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Feb 26, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 5, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=2.6.19
- Affected versionversion=ac27a0ec112a089f1a5102bc8dffc79c8c815571 <24b8206fec1db21d7e82f21f0b2ff5e5672cf5b3
- Affected versionversion=ac27a0ec112a089f1a5102bc8dffc79c8c815571 <3a3ce941645407cd0b0b7f01ad9e2ea3770f46cc
- Affected versionversion=ac27a0ec112a089f1a5102bc8dffc79c8c815571 <3ba733f879c2a88910744647e41edeefbc0d92b2
- Affected versionversion=ac27a0ec112a089f1a5102bc8dffc79c8c815571 <6084240bfc44bf265ab6ae7d96980469b05be0f1
- Affected versionversion=ac27a0ec112a089f1a5102bc8dffc79c8c815571 <b3ad9ff6f06c1dc6abf7437691c88ca3d6da3ac0
- Affected versionversion=ac27a0ec112a089f1a5102bc8dffc79c8c815571 <d5a16a6df2c16eaf4de04948553ef0089dee463f
- Affected versionversion=ac27a0ec112a089f1a5102bc8dffc79c8c815571 <e157c8f87e8fac112d6c955e69a60cdb9bc80a60
- Affected versionversion=ac27a0ec112a089f1a5102bc8dffc79c8c815571 <ff4cafa51762da3824881a9000ca421d4b78b138
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo