Autofill data disclosure via EyeDropper interaction bypass
Published Jul 28, 2023 · Updated Feb 13, 2025
Inappropriate Autofill behavior in Google Chrome before 107.0.5304.62 allows remote attackers to bypass navigation restrictions via crafted HTML. A page invokes the EyeDropper API to reset Chrome's mouse-observation state, defeating checks that require pointer movement or keyboard input before an Autofill choice. Exploitation requires a user to visit the page and make consecutive clicks, after which the page can steer Autofill selection and obtain saved form data.
Summary
What happened
Inappropriate Autofill behavior in Google Chrome before 107.0.5304.62 allows remote attackers to bypass navigation restrictions via crafted HTML. A page invokes the EyeDropper API to reset Chrome's mouse-observation state, defeating checks that require pointer movement or keyboard input before an Autofill choice. Exploitation requires a user to visit the page and make consecutive clicks, after which the page can steer Autofill selection and obtain saved form data.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-4910
- Published
- Jul 28, 2023
- Updated
- Feb 13, 2025
- Vendor
- Google Cloud
- Product
- Google Chrome
- Classifications
- T1189
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 28, 2023CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Feb 13, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=107.0.5304.62 <107.0.5304.62
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Chromium Autofill EyeDropper reproduction caseproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo