Unauthorized actions via improper request nonce validation
Published May 22, 2023 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
CSRF in Extra Block Design, Style, CSS for ANY Gutenberg Blocks 0.2.6 and earlier allows remote attackers to trigger unspecified actions. An unidentified plugin function processes a request without reliable WordPress nonce validation; public sources do not name the function or operation. Exploitation requires an administrator with an active WordPress session to open an attacker-controlled link, and the documented consequence is limited to invoking the affected function.
Summary
What happened
CSRF in Extra Block Design, Style, CSS for ANY Gutenberg Blocks 0.2.6 and earlier allows remote attackers to trigger unspecified actions. An unidentified plugin function processes a request without reliable WordPress nonce validation; public sources do not name the function or operation. Exploitation requires an administrator with an active WordPress session to open an attacker-controlled link, and the documented consequence is limited to invoking the affected function.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-47183
- Published
- May 22, 2023
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- StylistWP
- Product
- Extra Block Design, Style, CSS for ANY Gutenberg Blocks
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-62, T1204.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 22, 2023CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a <=0.2.6
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo