Application hang via unclosed XPM comment
Published Feb 7, 2023 · Updated Mar 25, 2025
Infinite-loop denial of service in X.Org libXpm before 3.5.15 allows attackers to hang linked applications with a malformed XPM file. ParseComment() repeatedly calls getc() while seeking a closing comment marker but fails to stop when an unclosed C-style comment reaches end of file. Exploitation requires an application linked to the library to parse the crafted file, and the resulting loop interrupts that application without reported data disclosure or modification.
Summary
What happened
Infinite-loop denial of service in X.Org libXpm before 3.5.15 allows attackers to hang linked applications with a malformed XPM file. ParseComment() repeatedly calls getc() while seeking a closing comment marker but fails to stop when an unclosed C-style comment reaches end of file. Exploitation requires an application linked to the library to parse the crafted file, and the resulting loop interrupts that application without reported data disclosure or modification.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-46285
- Published
- Feb 7, 2023
- Updated
- Mar 25, 2025
- Vendor
- X.Org
- Product
- libXpm
- Classifications
- CWE-835, T1499.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Feb 7, 2023CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Mar 25, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=3.5.15
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo