Unauthenticated rating tampering via concurrent voting requests
Published Nov 30, 2022 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
Race condition in TechnoWich WP ULike 4.6.4 and earlier allows remote attackers to increase or decrease WordPress rating scores. Public disclosures identify the voting update path as the affected locus but do not name the function or publish the check-and-update sequence. No authentication or user interaction is required; concurrent requests can corrupt rating integrity, with no reported confidentiality or availability impact.
Summary
What happened
Race condition in TechnoWich WP ULike 4.6.4 and earlier allows remote attackers to increase or decrease WordPress rating scores. Public disclosures identify the voting update path as the affected locus but do not name the function or publish the check-and-update sequence. No authentication or user interaction is required; concurrent requests can corrupt rating integrity, with no reported confidentiality or availability impact.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-45842
- Published
- Nov 30, 2022
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- TechnoWich
- Product
- WP ULike
- Classifications
- CWE-367, CAPEC-26
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Nov 30, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a <=4.6.4 changes=[{"at":"4.6.5","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo