Unwanted administrator actions via missing nonce validation
Published May 25, 2023 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
Cross-site request forgery in StylemixThemes GDPR Compliance & Cookie Consent 1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to trigger an unwanted action. The affected function is not publicly named; it accepts a forged request without correct WordPress nonce validation and executes it under the victim session. Exploitation requires a logged-in administrator to click a malicious link or submit a crafted form, and the published impact is limited to unauthorized modification.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in StylemixThemes GDPR Compliance & Cookie Consent 1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to trigger an unwanted action. The affected function is not publicly named; it accepts a forged request without correct WordPress nonce validation and executes it under the victim session. Exploitation requires a logged-in administrator to click a malicious link or submit a crafted form, and the published impact is limited to unauthorized modification.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-45815
- Published
- May 25, 2023
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- StylemixThemes
- Product
- GDPR Compliance & Cookie Consent
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-62, T1204.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 25, 2023CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a <=1.2
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo