Service disruption via unprotected backup GET requests
Published Jan 18, 2023 · Updated Jan 16, 2025
Cross-site request forgery in Sewio Networks RTLS Studio 2.0.0 through 2.6.2 allows remote attackers to disrupt service via backup operations. The backup and restore handler accepts state-changing HTTP GET requests without anti-CSRF protections, including requests that restore factory defaults. Exploitation requires a privileged user signed in to the web service to follow an attacker-crafted link, enabling unauthorized backup or restore actions that can interrupt service.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in Sewio Networks RTLS Studio 2.0.0 through 2.6.2 allows remote attackers to disrupt service via backup operations. The backup and restore handler accepts state-changing HTTP GET requests without anti-CSRF protections, including requests that restore factory defaults. Exploitation requires a privileged user signed in to the web service to follow an attacker-crafted link, enabling unauthorized backup or restore actions that can interrupt service.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-45127
- Published
- Jan 18, 2023
- Updated
- Jan 16, 2025
- Vendor
- Sewio Networks
- Product
- RTLS Studio
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-62, T1204.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 18, 2023CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jan 16, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=2.0.0 <=2.6.2
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo