Remote site changes via forged requests
Published Nov 17, 2022 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
Cross-Site Request Forgery in OnTheGoSystems WPML Multilingual CMS 4.5.13 and earlier allows remote attackers to alter site data via crafted requests. Public records do not disclose the specific WPML component or operation that fails to validate request origin. Exploitation requires a victim who is authenticated to WordPress to load attacker-controlled content, and the documented impact is unauthorized integrity changes with possible limited availability effects.
Summary
What happened
Cross-Site Request Forgery in OnTheGoSystems WPML Multilingual CMS 4.5.13 and earlier allows remote attackers to alter site data via crafted requests. Public records do not disclose the specific WPML component or operation that fails to validate request origin. Exploitation requires a victim who is authenticated to WordPress to load attacker-controlled content, and the documented impact is unauthorized integrity changes with possible limited availability effects.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-45071
- Published
- Nov 17, 2022
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- OnTheGoSystems
- Product
- WPML Multilingual CMS
- Classifications
- CWE-352
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Nov 17, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=<= 4.5.13 <=4.5.13
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo