Authenticated feedback submission via missing authorization
Published Jan 17, 2024 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
Missing authorization in CodePeople WP Time Slots Booking Form 1.1.76 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to submit feedback. The feedback submission handler accepts and processes requests without verifying that the logged-in user is permitted to send plugin feedback. Any WordPress account can therefore send unauthorized feedback through the site's plugin installation, with no reported confidentiality or availability impact.
Summary
What happened
Missing authorization in CodePeople WP Time Slots Booking Form 1.1.76 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to submit feedback. The feedback submission handler accepts and processes requests without verifying that the logged-in user is permitted to send plugin feedback. Any WordPress account can therefore send unauthorized feedback through the site's plugin installation, with no reported confidentiality or availability impact.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-41790
- Published
- Jan 17, 2024
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- CodePeople
- Product
- WP Time Slots Booking Form
- Classifications
- CWE-862
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 17, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a <=1.1.76 changes=[{"at":"1.1.77","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo