Service mesh intention bypass via multi-SAN CSR
Published Sep 23, 2022 · Updated May 27, 2025
Authorization bypass in HashiCorp Consul and Consul Enterprise up to 1.11.8, 1.12.4, and 1.13.1 allows attackers to evade mesh intentions. The internal server agent RPC endpoint accepts a crafted certificate signing request containing multiple SAN URI values and signs additional service identities instead of enforcing a single URI. Exploitation requires a client agent mTLS certificate and a valid ACL token for any mesh service, granting access that configured service mesh intentions should deny.
Summary
What happened
Authorization bypass in HashiCorp Consul and Consul Enterprise up to 1.11.8, 1.12.4, and 1.13.1 allows attackers to evade mesh intentions. The internal server agent RPC endpoint accepts a crafted certificate signing request containing multiple SAN URI values and signs additional service identities instead of enforcing a single URI. Exploitation requires a client agent mTLS certificate and a valid ACL token for any mesh service, granting access that configured service mesh intentions should deny.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-40716
- Published
- Sep 23, 2022
- Updated
- May 27, 2025
- Vendor
- Unknown vendor
- Product
- Unknown product
- Classifications
- CWE-252, T1649
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Sep 23, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 27, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Affected products and versions are unavailable in this record.
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo