Cellular traffic exposure via improper authentication
Published Dec 8, 2022 · Updated Apr 23, 2025
Improper authentication in the Exynos baseband before SMR Dec-2022 Release 1 allows remote attackers to disable cellular traffic encryption. Samsung has not disclosed which baseband authentication path fails or how untrusted signaling bypasses its validation. The attacker must be within cellular-network reach of the UE and gNodeB; exploitation removes confidentiality protection without reported integrity or availability impact.
Summary
What happened
Improper authentication in the Exynos baseband before SMR Dec-2022 Release 1 allows remote attackers to disable cellular traffic encryption. Samsung has not disclosed which baseband authentication path fails or how untrusted signaling bypasses its validation. The attacker must be within cellular-network reach of the UE and gNodeB; exploitation removes confidentiality protection without reported integrity or availability impact.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-39901
- Published
- Dec 8, 2022
- Updated
- Apr 23, 2025
- Vendor
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
- Product
- Samsung Mobile Devices
- Classifications
- CWE-287, T1600
- Attack vector
- adjacent
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 8, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 23, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=Exynos baseband <SMR Dec-2022 Release 1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo