Unauthenticated SSRF via unchecked request URL
Published Sep 9, 2022 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
Server-Side Request Forgery in Rank Math SEO 1.0.95 and earlier allows remote attackers to make the WordPress server request attacker-chosen URLs. The plugin insufficiently validates user-supplied URL input before issuing outbound requests, allowing access to arbitrary domains and potentially internal services. No authentication is required; impact is primarily disclosure of data reachable from the WordPress host, with the exact exposed resources depending on network placement.
Summary
What happened
Server-Side Request Forgery in Rank Math SEO 1.0.95 and earlier allows remote attackers to make the WordPress server request attacker-chosen URLs. The plugin insufficiently validates user-supplied URL input before issuing outbound requests, allowing access to arbitrary domains and potentially internal services. No authentication is required; impact is primarily disclosure of data reachable from the WordPress host, with the exact exposed resources depending on network placement.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-36376
- Published
- Sep 9, 2022
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- Rank Math SEO
- Product
- Rank Math SEO
- Classifications
- CWE-918, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Sep 9, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=<= 1.0.95 <=1.0.95
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo