Remote code execution via malformed TCP packets
Published Oct 11, 2022 · Updated Nov 20, 2024
Classic buffer overflow in Siemens LOGO! 8 BM and SIPLUS LOGO! 8 BM devices allows remote attackers to execute custom code. Several TCP-processing methods fail to validate packet structure before copying input, allowing buffer overflows and instruction-counter control. No authentication or user interaction is required; network access to the affected TCP services exposes confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Summary
What happened
Classic buffer overflow in Siemens LOGO! 8 BM and SIPLUS LOGO! 8 BM devices allows remote attackers to execute custom code. Several TCP-processing methods fail to validate packet structure before copying input, allowing buffer overflows and instruction-counter control. No authentication or user interaction is required; network access to the affected TCP services exposes confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-36361
- Published
- Oct 11, 2022
- Updated
- Nov 20, 2024
- Vendor
- Siemens
- Product
- SIPLUS LOGO! 24RCEo
- Classifications
- CWE-120, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Oct 11, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 20, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <*
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo