Management actions via forged browser requests
Published Aug 16, 2022 · Updated Aug 3, 2024
Cross-site request forgery in Airspan AirVelocity 1500 15.18.00.2511 allows remote attackers to send requests through a user's browser. The eNodeB web management UI accepts browser requests without checking an anti-CSRF token or otherwise verifying that the logged-in user intentionally initiated them. Exploitation requires user interaction and an authenticated management session; Airspan has not disclosed the affected endpoints or bounded the management actions available.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in Airspan AirVelocity 1500 15.18.00.2511 allows remote attackers to send requests through a user's browser. The eNodeB web management UI accepts browser requests without checking an anti-CSRF token or otherwise verifying that the logged-in user intentionally initiated them. Exploitation requires user interaction and an authenticated management session; Airspan has not disclosed the affected endpoints or bounded the management actions available.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-36312
- Published
- Aug 16, 2022
- Updated
- Aug 3, 2024
- Vendor
- Airspan Networks
- Product
- AirVelocity
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-62, T1204.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 16, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 3, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=unspecified <=15
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo