Unsafe built-in execution via unchecked with replacement
Published Sep 8, 2022 · Updated Apr 22, 2025
Protection bypass in OPA 0.40.0 through 0.43.0 allows attackers to invoke forbidden built-ins through untrusted Rego policies. The Rego compiler's WithUnsafeBuiltins and rego.UnsafeBuiltins paths fail to check a with replacement against the unsafe-built-in map, allowing a safe function to resolve to http.send or opa.runtime. Impact requires a Go API integration that evaluates attacker-supplied policy with unsafe built-ins configured, or a public Query API relying on that restriction; bypass enables outbound requests or disclosure of runtime configuration and environment variables.
Summary
What happened
Protection bypass in OPA 0.40.0 through 0.43.0 allows attackers to invoke forbidden built-ins through untrusted Rego policies. The Rego compiler's WithUnsafeBuiltins and rego.UnsafeBuiltins paths fail to check a with replacement against the unsafe-built-in map, allowing a safe function to resolve to http.send or opa.runtime. Impact requires a Go API integration that evaluates attacker-supplied policy with unsafe built-ins configured, or a public Query API relying on that restriction; bypass enables outbound requests or disclosure of runtime configuration and environment variables.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-36085
- Published
- Sep 8, 2022
- Updated
- Apr 22, 2025
- Vendor
- Open Policy Agent
- Product
- Open Policy Agent (OPA)
- Classifications
- CWE-693, CWE-20, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Sep 8, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 22, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=>= 0.40.0, < 0.43.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- GHSA-f524-rf33-2jjr demonstration policyproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo