Integer underflow via unchecked replacement count
Published Dec 22, 2022 · Updated Apr 15, 2025
Integer underflow in Mozilla Firefox, Firefox ESR, and Thunderbird allows remote attackers to cause unspecified impact via unspecified vectors. nsTArray_Impl::ReplaceElementsAt() calculates Length() + aArrayLen - aCount without first rejecting an out-of-range aCount, allowing the allocation-size expression to underflow. NVD classifies the path as network-reachable with user interaction, while Mozilla publishes no concrete external trigger or resulting consequence.
Summary
What happened
Integer underflow in Mozilla Firefox, Firefox ESR, and Thunderbird allows remote attackers to cause unspecified impact via unspecified vectors. nsTArray_Impl::ReplaceElementsAt() calculates Length() + aArrayLen - aCount without first rejecting an out-of-range aCount, allowing the allocation-size expression to underflow. NVD classifies the path as network-reachable with user interaction, while Mozilla publishes no concrete external trigger or resulting consequence.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-34481
- Published
- Dec 22, 2022
- Updated
- Apr 15, 2025
- Vendor
- Mozilla
- Product
- Firefox
- Classifications
- CWE-190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 22, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 15, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=unspecified <102
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo