Authenticated command execution via unsanitized SDK path
Published Jun 30, 2022 · Updated Apr 15, 2025
OS command injection in Robustel R1510 3.3.0 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands through an SDK import request. The /action/import_sdk_file/ handler reads the path parameter, formats it into mkdir -p %s with sysprintf, and passes the resulting string to system without shell metacharacter neutralization. Administrative access to the web interface and a POST upload sequence are required; successful exploitation runs attacker-supplied commands on the router.
Summary
What happened
OS command injection in Robustel R1510 3.3.0 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands through an SDK import request. The /action/import_sdk_file/ handler reads the path parameter, formats it into mkdir -p %s with sysprintf, and passes the resulting string to system without shell metacharacter neutralization. Administrative access to the web interface and a POST upload sequence are required; successful exploitation runs attacker-supplied commands on the router.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-33314
- Published
- Jun 30, 2022
- Updated
- Apr 15, 2025
- Vendor
- Robustel
- Product
- R1510
- Classifications
- CWE-78, T1059
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- admin
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jun 30, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 15, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=3.3.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- TALOS-2022-1572 technical proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo