Script execution via unsanitized saved tag names
Published Sep 20, 2022 · Updated May 27, 2025
Stored cross-site scripting in Microweber before 1.3.2 allows remote attackers to execute script in a user's browser via a crafted tag name. The getTagButtonHtmlInForm function inserts the saved name directly into a button's HTML without converting it to text or neutralizing markup. Exploitation requires a victim to load the saved tag in the tag-management interface, where injected markup executes with that user's browser privileges.
Summary
What happened
Stored cross-site scripting in Microweber before 1.3.2 allows remote attackers to execute script in a user's browser via a crafted tag name. The getTagButtonHtmlInForm function inserts the saved name directly into a button's HTML without converting it to text or neutralizing markup. Exploitation requires a victim to load the saved tag in the tag-management interface, where injected markup executes with that user's browser privileges.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-3245
- Published
- Sep 20, 2022
- Updated
- May 27, 2025
- Vendor
- Microweber
- Product
- Microweber
- Classifications
- CWE-94, CWE-79, T1059.007
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Sep 20, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 27, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=unspecified <1.3.2
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- huntr.dev CVE-2022-3245 proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo