Smart-contract call reverts via invalid Boolean decoding
Published Jul 21, 2022 · Updated Apr 23, 2025
Improper input validation in OpenZeppelin Contracts 4.0.0 through 4.7.0 allows remote attackers to revert smart-contract calls. ERC165Checker.supportsInterface passes a target contract's return data to Solidity 0.8 abi.decode, which reverts on Boolean values other than 0 or 1 instead of returning false. Exploitation requires a consuming contract to query a nonconforming target and to handle unsupported interfaces without an intentional revert.
Summary
What happened
Improper input validation in OpenZeppelin Contracts 4.0.0 through 4.7.0 allows remote attackers to revert smart-contract calls. ERC165Checker.supportsInterface passes a target contract's return data to Solidity 0.8 abi.decode, which reverts on Boolean values other than 0 or 1 instead of returning false. Exploitation requires a consuming contract to query a nonconforming target and to handle unsupported interfaces without an intentional revert.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-31170
- Published
- Jul 21, 2022
- Updated
- Apr 23, 2025
- Vendor
- OpenZeppelin
- Product
- OpenZeppelin Contracts
- Classifications
- CWE-20, CWE-252
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 21, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 23, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=>= 4.0.0, < 4.7.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
- ERC165MaliciousData regression contractproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo