Revoked-domain persistence via stale child delegations
Published Aug 1, 2022 · Updated Sep 16, 2024
Cache validation failure in NLnet Labs Unbound 1.16.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to keep revoked domains resolvable. The child-centric resolver accepts nested delegation data from a rogue nameserver without revalidating the parent delegation, allowing repeated queries to refresh child cache entries. Remote attackers must control a rogue domain and induce resolver queries; the bounded consequence is continued resolution after the parent delegation is revoked.
Summary
What happened
Cache validation failure in NLnet Labs Unbound 1.16.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to keep revoked domains resolvable. The child-centric resolver accepts nested delegation data from a rogue nameserver without revalidating the parent delegation, allowing repeated queries to refresh child cache entries. Remote attackers must control a rogue domain and induce resolver queries; the bounded consequence is continued resolution after the parent delegation is revoked.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-30698
- Published
- Aug 1, 2022
- Updated
- Sep 16, 2024
- Vendor
- NLnet Labs
- Product
- Unbound
- Classifications
- CWE-613
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 1, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Sep 16, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=unspecified <=1.16.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo