Incorrect contract outcomes via double address evaluation
Published Jun 6, 2022 · Updated Apr 22, 2025
Incorrect control flow in Vyper before 0.3.4 allows remote attackers to alter contract outcomes when external calls omit return values. The compiler evaluates the external contract address expression twice, repeating side effects and potentially changing which address or state is used for the call. Exploitation requires a contract compiled with an affected Vyper version and a call expression whose address computation has side effects; the consequence is integrity-impacting, incorrect contract execution rather than direct data disclosure.
Summary
What happened
Incorrect control flow in Vyper before 0.3.4 allows remote attackers to alter contract outcomes when external calls omit return values. The compiler evaluates the external contract address expression twice, repeating side effects and potentially changing which address or state is used for the call. Exploitation requires a contract compiled with an affected Vyper version and a call expression whose address computation has side effects; the consequence is integrity-impacting, incorrect contract execution rather than direct data disclosure.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-29255
- Published
- Jun 6, 2022
- Updated
- Apr 22, 2025
- Vendor
- Vyper
- Product
- Vyper
- Classifications
- CWE-670
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jun 6, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 22, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 0.3.4
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo