Process crash via premature GPGME object finalization
Published Sep 1, 2022 · Updated Aug 3, 2024
Use-after-free in Podman 1.6.4-32.el7_9 allows remote attackers to crash the process or execute code during GPG signature verification. The vendored Go GPGME wrapper fails to keep Go objects alive while C code uses their pointers, allowing garbage collection to release referenced memory before GPGME finishes. Exploitation requires Podman to pull and verify an attacker-controlled signed container image; the bounded outcomes are process failure or code execution in the Podman process.
Summary
What happened
Use-after-free in Podman 1.6.4-32.el7_9 allows remote attackers to crash the process or execute code during GPG signature verification. The vendored Go GPGME wrapper fails to keep Go objects alive while C code uses their pointers, allowing garbage collection to release referenced memory before GPGME finishes. Exploitation requires Podman to pull and verify an attacker-controlled signed container image; the bounded outcomes are process failure or code execution in the Podman process.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-2738
- Published
- Sep 1, 2022
- Updated
- Aug 3, 2024
- Vendor
- 389 Directory Server
- Product
- Podman
- Classifications
- CWE-416, T1204.002
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Sep 1, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 3, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=podman 1.6.4-32.el7_9
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo