Request smuggling via conflicting body framing
Published Jun 8, 2022 · Updated Aug 3, 2024
HTTP request smuggling in Apache HTTP Server 2.4.53 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject requests through mod_proxy_ajp. The handler accepts only an exact chunked Transfer-Encoding value but otherwise falls back to Content-Length, allowing conflicting framing to desynchronize HTTP and AJP parsing. The server must load mod_proxy and mod_proxy_ajp and route an exposed path to an AJP backend, where smuggled requests can bypass intended front-end request handling.
Summary
What happened
HTTP request smuggling in Apache HTTP Server 2.4.53 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject requests through mod_proxy_ajp. The handler accepts only an exact chunked Transfer-Encoding value but otherwise falls back to Content-Length, allowing conflicting framing to desynchronize HTTP and AJP parsing. The server must load mod_proxy and mod_proxy_ajp and route an exposed path to an AJP backend, where smuggled requests can bypass intended front-end request handling.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-26377
- Published
- Jun 8, 2022
- Updated
- Aug 3, 2024
- Vendor
- The Apache Software Foundation
- Product
- Apache HTTP Server
- Classifications
- CWE-444, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jun 8, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 3, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=Apache HTTP Server 2.4 <=2.4.53
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- IBM QRadar AJP smuggling proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo