Unauthenticated map deletion via CSRF
Published Mar 11, 2022 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
Cross-Site Request Forgery in WP Google Map Plugin 4.2.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to alter map data via crafted requests. Delete Marker Category, Delete Map, and Copy Map handlers accept state-changing requests without validating a CSRF token, so a logged-in administrator can be induced to perform those actions. Exploitation requires the administrator to visit or trigger attacker-controlled content; impact is limited to unauthorized map-management changes.
Summary
What happened
Cross-Site Request Forgery in WP Google Map Plugin 4.2.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to alter map data via crafted requests. Delete Marker Category, Delete Map, and Copy Map handlers accept state-changing requests without validating a CSRF token, so a logged-in administrator can be induced to perform those actions. Exploitation requires the administrator to visit or trigger attacker-controlled content; impact is limited to unauthorized map-management changes.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-25600
- Published
- Mar 11, 2022
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- Saidur Rahman Milon
- Product
- WP Google Map Plugin
- Classifications
- CWE-352
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 11, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=<= 4.2.3 <=4.2.3
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo