Session hijacking via JavaScript-readable authentication cookies
Published Jun 8, 2022 · Updated Mar 11, 2025
Sensitive-cookie exposure in ITarian before 6.35.37347.20040 allows remote attackers to hijack Service Desk sessions via XSS. The platform issues OSTSESSID and SSO token session cookies without HttpOnly, so injected JavaScript can read and exfiltrate them. Exploitation requires the optional Service Desk module, a successful XSS payload, and a user who opens or previews the crafted ticket; a stolen token grants access to the ticketing system or MSP dashboard.
Summary
What happened
Sensitive-cookie exposure in ITarian before 6.35.37347.20040 allows remote attackers to hijack Service Desk sessions via XSS. The platform issues OSTSESSID and SSO token session cookies without HttpOnly, so injected JavaScript can read and exfiltrate them. Exploitation requires the optional Service Desk module, a successful XSS payload, and a user who opens or previews the crafted ticket; a stolen token grants access to the ticketing system or MSP dashboard.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-25151
- Published
- Jun 8, 2022
- Updated
- Mar 11, 2025
- Vendor
- ITarian
- Product
- ITarian
- Classifications
- CWE-732, CWE-614, T1539
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jun 8, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Mar 11, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=any version <6.35.37347.20040
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- DIVD cookie-theft demonstrationproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo