Token theft via retained integration credentials
Published Aug 5, 2022 · Updated Aug 3, 2024
Information exposure in affected GitLab CE/EE releases allows remote authenticated users to steal integration access tokens through changed URLs. When a project maintainer replaces an integration's destination URL, GitLab retains the write-only stored token and sends it in an authenticated test or webhook request to the replacement server. Maintainer-level project access, a previously configured integration token, and a release from 12.6 through 15.0.4, 15.1 through 15.1.3, or 15.2.0 are required; compromise extends to the external service authorized by that token.
Summary
What happened
Information exposure in affected GitLab CE/EE releases allows remote authenticated users to steal integration access tokens through changed URLs. When a project maintainer replaces an integration's destination URL, GitLab retains the write-only stored token and sends it in an authenticated test or webhook request to the replacement server. Maintainer-level project access, a previously configured integration token, and a release from 12.6 through 15.0.4, 15.1 through 15.1.3, or 15.2.0 are required; compromise extends to the external service authorized by that token.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-2497
- Published
- Aug 5, 2022
- Updated
- Aug 3, 2024
- Vendor
- GitLab
- Product
- GitLab
- Classifications
- T1528
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 5, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 3, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=>=12.6, <15.0.5
- Affected versionversion=>=15.1, <15.1.4
- Affected versionversion=>=15.2, <15.2.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo