Command injection via IPC socket race
Published Aug 16, 2022 · Updated Aug 3, 2024
Race condition in Eternal Terminal before 6.2.0 allows local users to inject commands into future client sessions through an IPC socket. pipeSocketHandler::listen() unlinks /tmp/etserver.idpasskey.fifo before binding it, letting a competing process replace the path and impersonate the server. Exploitation requires crashing or restarting a systemd-managed service and winning the local race; successful hijacking grants control of commands delivered to later clients.
Summary
What happened
Race condition in Eternal Terminal before 6.2.0 allows local users to inject commands into future client sessions through an IPC socket. pipeSocketHandler::listen() unlinks /tmp/etserver.idpasskey.fifo before binding it, letting a competing process replace the path and impersonate the server. Exploitation requires crashing or restarting a systemd-managed service and winning the local race; successful hijacking grants control of commands delivered to later clients.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-24951
- Published
- Aug 16, 2022
- Updated
- Aug 3, 2024
- Vendor
- Eternal Terminal Project
- Product
- Eternal Terminal
- Classifications
- CWE-362, T1059
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 16, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 3, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=unspecified <6.2.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Local IPC socket hijacking proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo