Directory-data inference via unescaped LDAP usernames
Published Apr 11, 2022 · Updated Apr 23, 2025
LDAP injection in GoCD 17.5.0 through 22.0.0 allows remote authenticated users to infer LDAP directory data through crafted usernames. The bundled ldap-authentication-plugin inserts the supplied username into an LDAP search filter without encoding LDAP special characters. Exploitation requires a working LDAP authorization configuration and an existing LDAP-authenticated account, and repeated queries can reveal usernames, alternate attributes, or password hashes.
Summary
What happened
LDAP injection in GoCD 17.5.0 through 22.0.0 allows remote authenticated users to infer LDAP directory data through crafted usernames. The bundled ldap-authentication-plugin inserts the supplied username into an LDAP search filter without encoding LDAP special characters. Exploitation requires a working LDAP authorization configuration and an existing LDAP-authenticated account, and repeated queries can reveal usernames, alternate attributes, or password hashes.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-24832
- Published
- Apr 11, 2022
- Updated
- Apr 23, 2025
- Vendor
- Thoughtworks
- Product
- GoCD
- Classifications
- CWE-90, CWE-74, T1087.002
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 11, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 23, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=>= 17.5.0, < 22.1.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo