Request smuggling via lenient HTTP parsing
Published Mar 30, 2022 · Updated Apr 23, 2025
HTTP request smuggling in Puma before 4.3.12 and 5.0.0 through 5.6.3 allows remote attackers to smuggle requests through a proxy. Puma's request-body parser accepts unsupported or repeated Transfer-Encoding values, malformed Content-Length and chunk sizes, and invalid chunk endings instead of rejecting them. Exploitation requires a front-end proxy that parses the crafted request differently, allowing attacker-controlled bytes to become a subsequent request.
Summary
What happened
HTTP request smuggling in Puma before 4.3.12 and 5.0.0 through 5.6.3 allows remote attackers to smuggle requests through a proxy. Puma's request-body parser accepts unsupported or repeated Transfer-Encoding values, malformed Content-Length and chunk sizes, and invalid chunk endings instead of rejecting them. Exploitation requires a front-end proxy that parses the crafted request differently, allowing attacker-controlled bytes to become a subsequent request.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-24790
- Published
- Mar 30, 2022
- Updated
- Apr 23, 2025
- Vendor
- Puma
- Product
- Puma
- Classifications
- CWE-444, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 30, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 23, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 4.3.12
- Affected versionversion=>= 5.0.0, < 5.6.4
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo