Clickjacking via missing frame-denial response header
Published Mar 14, 2022 · Updated Apr 23, 2025
Clickjacking in Sylius before 1.9.10, 1.10.0 through 1.10.10, and 1.11.0 through 1.11.1 allows remote attackers to hijack user clicks. Application responses omit the X-Frame-Options header, allowing an attacker-controlled page to frame login forms and overlay deceptive controls. A victim must visit the attacker-controlled page and interact with the framed interface; successful interaction can disclose or modify data available to the victim.
Summary
What happened
Clickjacking in Sylius before 1.9.10, 1.10.0 through 1.10.10, and 1.11.0 through 1.11.1 allows remote attackers to hijack user clicks. Application responses omit the X-Frame-Options header, allowing an attacker-controlled page to frame login forms and overlay deceptive controls. A victim must visit the attacker-controlled page and interact with the framed interface; successful interaction can disclose or modify data available to the victim.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-24733
- Published
- Mar 14, 2022
- Updated
- Apr 23, 2025
- Vendor
- Sylius
- Product
- Sylius
- Classifications
- CWE-1021, CAPEC-103, T1204
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 14, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 23, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=>= 1.10.0, < 1.10.11
- Affected versionversion=>= 1.11.0, < 1.11.2
- Affected versionversion=< 1.9.10
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo