Account misassociation via ambiguous username mapping
Published Apr 25, 2023 · Updated Feb 4, 2025
Username collision in Ping Identity PingID integration for Windows login before 2.9 allows local users to disrupt account identification. The username-mapping logic fails to distinguish different people who share a username when provisioned on the same machine at different times, causing the later identity to collide with the earlier mapping. Exploitation requires local user access and that duplicate-name provisioning sequence; the documented consequence is an identity collision, with no broader access or data impact published.
Summary
What happened
Username collision in Ping Identity PingID integration for Windows login before 2.9 allows local users to disrupt account identification. The username-mapping logic fails to distinguish different people who share a username when provisioned on the same machine at different times, causing the later identity to collide with the earlier mapping. Exploitation requires local user access and that duplicate-name provisioning sequence; the documented consequence is an identity collision, with no broader access or data impact published.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-23721
- Published
- Apr 25, 2023
- Updated
- Feb 4, 2025
- Vendor
- Unknown vendor
- Product
- Unknown product
- Classifications
- CWE-74, CWE-694
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 25, 2023CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Feb 4, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Affected products and versions are unavailable in this record.
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo