Service interruption via negative Content-Length integer underflow
Published Aug 17, 2022 · Updated Apr 16, 2025
Integer underflow in the FastCGI interface of Softing Secure Integration Server 1.22 and earlier allows remote attackers to interrupt service. The interface accepts an HTTP Content-Length header value of -1 and wraps the negative length while processing the declared request body. No authentication or user interaction is required; a crafted packet can halt availability, but the vendor does not specify whether the service hangs or crashes.
Summary
What happened
Integer underflow in the FastCGI interface of Softing Secure Integration Server 1.22 and earlier allows remote attackers to interrupt service. The interface accepts an HTTP Content-Length header value of -1 and wraps the negative length while processing the declared request body. No authentication or user interaction is required; a crafted packet can halt availability, but the vendor does not specify whether the service hangs or crashes.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-2335
- Published
- Aug 17, 2022
- Updated
- Apr 16, 2025
- Vendor
- Softing Industrial Automation GmbH
- Product
- Secure Integration Server
- Classifications
- CWE-191, T1499
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 17, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 16, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=V1.22
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo