Service interruption via unvalidated future ICCP timestamps
Published Sep 14, 2022 · Updated Jun 4, 2025
Improper input validation in MicroSCADA X SYS600 10.2 through 10.3.1 allows remote attackers to interrupt the service over ICCP. During ICCP connection establishment, the stack accepts data-item update timestamps too distant in the future and forwards them without validating the time quantity. The ICCP feature must be configured and enabled, which is not the default; exploitation can make the SYS600 service unavailable.
Summary
What happened
Improper input validation in MicroSCADA X SYS600 10.2 through 10.3.1 allows remote attackers to interrupt the service over ICCP. During ICCP connection establishment, the stack accepts data-item update timestamps too distant in the future and forwards them without validating the time quantity. The ICCP feature must be configured and enabled, which is not the default; exploitation can make the SYS600 service unavailable.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-2277
- Published
- Sep 14, 2022
- Updated
- Jun 4, 2025
- Vendor
- Hitachi Energy
- Product
- MicroSCADA X SYS600
- Classifications
- CWE-1284, T0814
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Sep 14, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jun 4, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=10.2
- Affected versionversion=10.2.1
- Affected versionversion=10.3
- Affected versionversion=10.3.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo