Authenticated SQL injection via fieldSelect concatenation
Published Apr 14, 2022 · Updated Apr 15, 2025
SQL injection in AssetActions.aspx in Lansweeper 9.1.20.2 allows remote authenticated users to alter asset data via a crafted HTTP request. AssetActions.cs splits the user-controlled fieldSelect value and concatenates each field name directly into an UPDATE statement without validation or parameter binding. An authenticated session with EditData permission is required; injected expressions execute in the database account's context and expose or alter application-accessible data.
Summary
What happened
SQL injection in AssetActions.aspx in Lansweeper 9.1.20.2 allows remote authenticated users to alter asset data via a crafted HTTP request. AssetActions.cs splits the user-controlled fieldSelect value and concatenates each field name directly into an UPDATE statement without validation or parameter binding. An authenticated session with EditData permission is required; injected expressions execute in the database account's context and expose or alter application-accessible data.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2022-21210
- Published
- Apr 14, 2022
- Updated
- Apr 15, 2025
- Vendor
- Lansweeper
- Product
- Lansweeper
- Classifications
- CWE-89, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 14, 2022CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 15, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=9.1.20.2
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Cisco Talos AssetActions.aspx fieldSelect proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo